Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken back, cooked Leader
Chicken back, cooked5
VS
Chicken thigh with skin, roasted
Chicken thigh with skin, roasted1

Chicken back, cooked leads 5–1 · 6 categories decided · 4 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken back, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 6 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken back, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Chicken thigh with skin, roasted for more potassium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar, magnesium and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    239 kcal
    232 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN28.19 g
    23.26 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    13.16 g
    14.71 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN3.6 g
    4.11 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN96 mg
    102 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    237 mg
    253 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN24 mg
    9 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.39 mg
    1.08 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    22 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken back, cooked vs Chicken thigh with skin, roasted · Foodatron