Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken back, cooked Leader
Chicken back, cooked7
VS
Chicken wing with skin, roasted
Chicken wing with skin, roasted0

Chicken back, cooked leads 7–0 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken back, cooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken back, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    239 kcal
    254 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN28.19 g
    23.79 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    13.16 g
    16.87 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN3.6 g
    4.98 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN96 mg
    98 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN237 mg
    212 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN24 mg
    18 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.39 mg
    0.84 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN22 mg
    19 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken back, cooked vs Chicken wing with skin, roasted · Foodatron