Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken back, cooked
Chicken back, cooked3
VS
Turkey bacon, cooked Leader
Turkey bacon, cooked5

Turkey bacon, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Chicken back, cooked: 100 g · Turkey bacon, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Turkey bacon, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken back, cooked for less sugar, less saturated fat and less sodium.

Pick Turkey bacon, cooked for more protein, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    239 kcal
    368 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    28.19 g
    29.5 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    4.24 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0 g
    4.24 g
  • Total fat
    13.16 g
    25.87 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN3.6 g
    6.93 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN96 mg
    2021 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    237 mg
    666 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    24 mg
    163 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.39 mg
    2.63 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    30 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken back, cooked vs Turkey bacon, cooked · Foodatron