Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast, cooked Leader
Chicken breast, cooked6
VS
Chicken drumstick, raw
Chicken drumstick, raw1

Chicken breast, cooked leads 6–1 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken breast, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Chicken drumstick, raw for less saturated fat.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    165 kcal
    116 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN31.02 g
    19.41 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    3.57 g
    3.71 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.01 g
    0.95 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN74 mg
    114 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN256 mg
    225 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN15 mg
    9 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.04 mg
    0.76 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN29 mg
    20 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, cooked vs Chicken drumstick, raw · Foodatron