Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast, cooked Leader
Chicken breast, cooked5
VS
Chicken feet, cooked
Chicken feet, cooked2

Chicken breast, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken breast, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Chicken feet, cooked for less sodium and more calcium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    165 kcal
    215 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN31.02 g
    19.4 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.2 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    3.57 g
    14.6 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.01 g
    3.92 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    74 mg
    67 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN256 mg
    31 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    15 mg
    88 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.04 mg
    0.91 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN29 mg
    5 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, cooked vs Chicken feet, cooked · Foodatron