Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron

Chicken breast, cooked leads 7–0 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Chicken breast, cooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN18.8 g
    6.8 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    1.39 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    2.16 g
    7.49 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.61 g
    3.09 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN44.85 mg
    594.59 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN155.15 mg
    91.51 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN9.09 mg
    4.63 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.63 mg
    0.34 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN17.58 mg
    5.41 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, cooked vs Chicken sausage, cooked · Foodatron