Chicken breast, cooked vs Shrimp, cooked

Chicken breast, cooked3

Leader

Shrimp, cooked4

Shrimp, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Shrimp, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, cooked for more protein, less sodium and more iron.

Pick Shrimp, cooked for less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
165 kcal
99 kcal
Proteinmore is better
WIN31.02 g
23.98 g
Carbohydrate
0 g
0.2 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
—
Total sugarsless is better
0 g
—
Total fat
3.57 g
0.28 g
Saturated fatless is better
1.01 g
0.06 gWIN
Sodiumless is better
WIN74 mg
111 mg
Potassiummore is better
256 mg
259 mgWIN
Calciummore is better
15 mg
70 mgWIN
Ironmore is better
WIN1.04 mg
0.51 mg
Magnesiummore is better
29 mg
39 mgWIN
Vitamin Cmore is better
0 mg
—
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.