Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast, raw
Chicken breast, raw4
VS
Chicken hearts, cooked
Chicken hearts, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, raw for less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Chicken hearts, cooked for more protein, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    120 kcal
    185 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    22.5 g
    26.41 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.1 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    2.62 g
    7.92 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.56 g
    2.26 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN45 mg
    48 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN334 mg
    132 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    5 mg
    19 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.37 mg
    9.03 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN28 mg
    20 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    1.8 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, raw vs Chicken hearts, cooked · Foodatron