Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast, raw
Chicken breast, raw3
VS
Turkey bacon, cooked Leader
Turkey bacon, cooked5

Turkey bacon, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Turkey bacon, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, raw for less sugar, less saturated fat and less sodium.

Pick Turkey bacon, cooked for more protein, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    120 kcal
    368 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    22.5 g
    29.5 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    4.24 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0 g
    4.24 g
  • Total fat
    2.62 g
    25.87 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.56 g
    6.93 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN45 mg
    2021 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    334 mg
    666 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    5 mg
    163 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.37 mg
    2.63 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    28 mg
    30 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, raw vs Turkey bacon, cooked · Foodatron