Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast with skin, roasted Leader
Chicken breast with skin, roasted4
VS
Chicken drumstick, cooked
Chicken drumstick, cooked3

Chicken breast with skin, roasted leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken breast with skin, roasted comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast with skin, roasted for more protein, less sodium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Pick Chicken drumstick, cooked for less saturated fat, more potassium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    197 kcal
    155 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.8 g
    24.24 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    7.78 g
    5.7 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    2.19 g
    1.51 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN71 mg
    128 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    245 mg
    256 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN14 mg
    11 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.07 mg
    1.14 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN27 mg
    22 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast with skin, roasted vs Chicken drumstick, cooked · Foodatron