Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted
Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted2
VS
Chicken gizzards, cooked Leader
Chicken gizzards, cooked5

Chicken gizzards, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken gizzards, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted for more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Chicken gizzards, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    191 kcal
    154 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    23.35 g
    30.39 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    10.15 g
    2.68 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    2.74 g
    0.67 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    123 mg
    56 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN247 mg
    179 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    11 mg
    17 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.11 mg
    3.19 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN22 mg
    3 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted vs Chicken gizzards, cooked · Foodatron