Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted vs Chicken, meat and skin, roasted

Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted2

Leader

Chicken, meat and skin, roasted5

Chicken, meat and skin, roasted leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken, meat and skin, roasted comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted for less saturated fat and more potassium.

Pick Chicken, meat and skin, roasted for more protein, less sodium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
191 kcal
239 kcal
Proteinmore is better
23.35 g
27.3 gWIN
Carbohydrate
0 g
0 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
0 g
Total sugarsless is better
0 g
0 g
Total fat
10.15 g
13.6 g
Saturated fatless is better
WIN2.74 g
3.79 g
Sodiumless is better
123 mg
82 mgWIN
Potassiummore is better
WIN247 mg
223 mg
Calciummore is better
11 mg
15 mgWIN
Ironmore is better
1.11 mg
1.26 mgWIN
Magnesiummore is better
22 mg
23 mgWIN
Vitamin Cmore is better
0 mg
0 mg
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.