Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted Leader
Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted4
VS
Chicken thigh, raw
Chicken thigh, raw3

Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted for more protein, more potassium, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Chicken thigh, raw for less saturated fat, less sodium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    191 kcal
    121 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN23.35 g
    19.66 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    10.15 g
    4.12 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    2.74 g
    1.1 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    123 mg
    95 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN247 mg
    242 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN11 mg
    7 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.11 mg
    0.81 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    23 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted vs Chicken thigh, raw · Foodatron