Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted Leader
Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted5
VS
Chicken wing, raw
Chicken wing, raw1

Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted leads 5–1 · 6 categories decided · 4 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted comes out ahead, winning 5 of 6 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Chicken wing, raw for less sodium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar, calcium and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    191 kcal
    191 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN23.35 g
    17.52 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    10.15 g
    12.85 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN2.74 g
    3.54 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    123 mg
    84 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN247 mg
    187 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    11 mg
    11 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.11 mg
    0.46 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN22 mg
    16 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted vs Chicken wing, raw · Foodatron