Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted Leader
Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted4
VS
Ground chicken, cooked
Ground chicken, cooked3

Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted for more protein, less saturated fat, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Ground chicken, cooked for less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    191 kcal
    189 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN23.35 g
    23.28 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    10.15 g
    10.92 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN2.74 g
    3.11 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    123 mg
    75 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    247 mg
    677 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN11 mg
    8 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.11 mg
    0.93 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    28 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted vs Ground chicken, cooked · Foodatron