Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted
Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted3
VS
Pheasant, cooked Leader
Pheasant, cooked5

Pheasant, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Pheasant, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted for less saturated fat, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Pheasant, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    12.23 g
    13.56 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    5.31 g
    5.06 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.43 g
    1.64 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    64.4 mg
    17.99 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN129.32 mg
    113.39 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    5.76 mg
    6.69 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.58 mg
    0.6 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN11.52 mg
    9.21 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0.96 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted vs Pheasant, cooked · Foodatron