Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Chickpeas, cooked Leader
Chickpeas, cooked4
VS
Shrimp, cooked
Shrimp, cooked3

Chickpeas, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chickpeas, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chickpeas, cooked for less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Shrimp, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat and more calcium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    164 kcal
    99 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    8.86 g
    23.98 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    27.42 g
    0.2 g
  • Fibermore is better
    7.6 g
    —
  • Total sugarsless is better
    4.8 g
    —
  • Total fat
    2.59 g
    0.28 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.27 g
    0.06 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN7 mg
    111 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN291 mg
    259 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    49 mg
    70 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.89 mg
    0.51 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN48 mg
    39 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    1.3 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chickpeas, cooked vs Shrimp, cooked · Foodatron