Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Chili con carne with beans Leader
Chili con carne with beans4
VS
Aussie Bites1

Chili con carne with beans leads 4–1 · 5 categories decided

Chili con carne with beans: 100 g · Aussie Bites: serving (26 g).

The verdict

Chili con carne with beans comes out ahead, winning 4 of 5 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chili con carne with beans for more protein, more fiber, less sugar and less saturated fat.

Pick Aussie Bites for less sodium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    107 kcal
    130 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN5.8 g
    2 g
  • Carbohydrate
    13.1 g
    15 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN3.3 g
    2 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN1.87 g
    7 g
  • Total fat
    3.47 g
    7 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.25 g
    2 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    449 mg
    90 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    264 mg
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    33 mg
    —
  • Ironmore is better
    1.34 mg
    —
  • Magnesiummore is better
    28 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.2 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.