Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Wild Alaska Pink Salmon1
VS
Leader
Albacore Solid White Tuna3

Albacore Solid White Tuna leads 3–1 · 4 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Albacore Solid White Tuna comes out ahead, winning 3 of 4 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Wild Alaska Pink Salmon for more iron.

Pick Albacore Solid White Tuna for more protein, less saturated fat and less sodium.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    117.65 kcal
    124.18 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    20 g
    27.45 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    4.12 g
    1.96 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.18 g
    0.33 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    305.88 mg
    222.22 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    —
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    235.29 mg
    —
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.47 mg
    0.26 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    —
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Wild Alaska Pink Salmon vs Albacore Solid White Tuna · Foodatron