Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
2% Low-Fat Classic2
VS
Part-skim ricotta Leader
Part-skim ricotta4

Part-skim ricotta leads 4–2 · 6 categories decided · 1 tie

2% Low-Fat Classic: serving (110 g) · Part-skim ricotta: 100 g.

The verdict

Part-skim ricotta comes out ahead, winning 4 of 6 nutrient match-ups.

Pick 2% Low-Fat Classic for more protein and less saturated fat.

Pick Part-skim ricotta for less sugar, less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    90 kcal
    138 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN14 g
    11.39 g
  • Carbohydrate
    4 g
    5.14 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    4 g
    0.31 gWIN
  • Total fat
    2 g
    7.91 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.5 g
    4.93 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    380 mg
    99 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    —
    125 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    110 mg
    272 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0 mg
    0.44 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    —
    15 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.