Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Leader
2% Low-Fat Classic3
VS
Full Fat Soft Cheese2

2% Low-Fat Classic leads 3–2 · 5 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

2% Low-Fat Classic comes out ahead, winning 3 of 5 nutrient match-ups.

Pick 2% Low-Fat Classic for more protein, less sugar and less saturated fat.

Pick Full Fat Soft Cheese for more fiber and less sodium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    81.82 kcal
    226.67 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN12.73 g
    5.4 g
  • Carbohydrate
    3.64 g
    4.3 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0.2 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN3.64 g
    4.3 g
  • Total fat
    1.82 g
    21 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.36 g
    14 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    345.45 mg
    300 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    —
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    100 mg
    —
  • Ironmore is better
    0 mg
    —
  • Magnesiummore is better
    —
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

2% Low-Fat Classic vs Full Fat Soft Cheese · Foodatron