Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
2% Low-Fat Classic2
VS
Leader
Full Fat Soft Cheese3

Full Fat Soft Cheese leads 3–2 · 5 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Full Fat Soft Cheese comes out ahead, winning 3 of 5 nutrient match-ups.

Pick 2% Low-Fat Classic for more protein and less saturated fat.

Pick Full Fat Soft Cheese for more fiber, less sugar and less sodium.

Evenly matched on iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN15.56 g
    1.66 g
  • Carbohydrate
    4.44 g
    1.09 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0.56 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    4.44 g
    1.09 gWIN
  • Total fat
    2.22 g
    8.64 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.67 g
    6.7 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    422.22 mg
    69.46 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    —
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    122.22 mg
    —
  • Ironmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    —
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

2% Low-Fat Classic vs Full Fat Soft Cheese · Foodatron