Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Maple sugar Leader
Maple sugar6
VS
Powdered (confectioners) sugar
Powdered (confectioners) sugar2

Maple sugar leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Maple sugar comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Maple sugar for more protein, less sugar, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Powdered (confectioners) sugar for less saturated fat and less sodium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    354 kcal
    389 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN0.1 g
    0 g
  • Carbohydrate
    90.9 g
    99.77 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN84.87 g
    97.81 g
  • Total fat
    0.2 g
    0 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.04 g
    0 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    11 mg
    2 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN274 mg
    2 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN90 mg
    1 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.61 mg
    0.06 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN19 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Maple sugar vs Powdered (confectioners) sugar · Foodatron