Salmon, cooked vs Shrimp, cooked

Salmon, cooked2

Leader

Shrimp, cooked5

Shrimp, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Shrimp, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Salmon, cooked for less sodium and more potassium.

Pick Shrimp, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
206 kcal
99 kcal
Proteinmore is better
22.1 g
23.98 gWIN
Carbohydrate
0 g
0.2 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
—
Total sugarsless is better
0 g
—
Total fat
12.35 g
0.28 g
Saturated fatless is better
2.4 g
0.06 gWIN
Sodiumless is better
WIN61 mg
111 mg
Potassiummore is better
WIN384 mg
259 mg
Calciummore is better
15 mg
70 mgWIN
Ironmore is better
0.34 mg
0.51 mgWIN
Magnesiummore is better
30 mg
39 mgWIN
Vitamin Cmore is better
3.7 mg
—
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.