Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Shrimp, cooked Leader
Shrimp, cooked4
VS
Turkey breast, cooked
Turkey breast, cooked3

Shrimp, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Shrimp, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Shrimp, cooked for less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Pick Turkey breast, cooked for more protein, less sodium and more iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    99 kcal
    147 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    23.98 g
    30.13 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0.2 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    0.28 g
    2.08 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.06 g
    0.59 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    111 mg
    99 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN259 mg
    249 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN70 mg
    9 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.51 mg
    0.71 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN39 mg
    32 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Shrimp, cooked vs Turkey breast, cooked · Foodatron