Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Shrimp, cooked
Shrimp, cooked2
VS
Yellowfin tuna, cooked Leader
Yellowfin tuna, cooked5

Yellowfin tuna, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Yellowfin tuna, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Shrimp, cooked for less saturated fat and more calcium.

Pick Yellowfin tuna, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    99 kcal
    130 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    23.98 g
    29.15 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0.2 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    0.28 g
    0.59 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.06 g
    0.21 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    111 mg
    54 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    259 mg
    527 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN70 mg
    4 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.51 mg
    0.92 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    39 mg
    42 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Shrimp, cooked vs Yellowfin tuna, cooked · Foodatron