Abalone, cooked vs Scottish Mackerel Fillets

Abalone, cooked leads 2–1 · 3 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Abalone, cooked comes out ahead, winning 2 of 3 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for more protein and less saturated fat.

Pick Scottish Mackerel Fillets for less sodium.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
189 kcal
192 kcal
Proteinmore is better
WIN19.63 g
14 g
Carbohydrate
11.05 g
3.4 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
0 g
Total sugarsless is better
—
3.4 g
Total fat
6.78 g
14 g
Saturated fatless is better
WIN1.65 g
3.1 g
Sodiumless is better
591 mg
295 mgWIN
Potassiummore is better
284 mg
—
Calciummore is better
37 mg
—
Ironmore is better
3.8 mg
—
Magnesiummore is better
56 mg
—
Vitamin Cmore is better
1.8 mg
—
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.