Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, cooked
Abalone, cooked3
VS
Bluefin tuna, cooked Leader
Bluefin tuna, cooked5

Bluefin tuna, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Bluefin tuna, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Pick Bluefin tuna, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    189 kcal
    184 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    19.63 g
    29.91 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    11.05 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    6.78 g
    6.28 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.65 g
    1.61 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    591 mg
    50 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    284 mg
    323 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN37 mg
    10 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN3.8 mg
    1.31 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    56 mg
    64 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN1.8 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, cooked vs Bluefin tuna, cooked · Foodatron