Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, cooked
Abalone, cooked3
VS
Chinook salmon, cooked Leader
Chinook salmon, cooked5

Chinook salmon, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chinook salmon, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for less saturated fat, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Chinook salmon, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    189 kcal
    231 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    19.63 g
    25.72 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    11.05 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    6.78 g
    13.38 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.65 g
    3.21 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    591 mg
    60 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    284 mg
    505 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN37 mg
    28 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN3.8 mg
    0.91 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    56 mg
    122 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    1.8 mg
    4.1 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, cooked vs Chinook salmon, cooked · Foodatron