Abalone, cooked vs Wild Alaska Pink Salmon

Wild Alaska Pink Salmon leads 3–2 · 5 categories decided · 1 tie

Abalone, cooked: 100 g · Wild Alaska Pink Salmon: 85 g.

The verdict

Wild Alaska Pink Salmon comes out ahead, winning 3 of 5 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for more protein and more iron.

Pick Wild Alaska Pink Salmon for less saturated fat, less sodium and more calcium.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
189 kcal
100 kcal
Proteinmore is better
WIN19.63 g
17 g
Carbohydrate
11.05 g
0 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
0 g
Total sugarsless is better
—
0 g
Total fat
6.78 g
3.5 g
Saturated fatless is better
1.65 g
1 gWIN
Sodiumless is better
591 mg
260 mgWIN
Potassiummore is better
284 mg
—
Calciummore is better
37 mg
200 mgWIN
Ironmore is better
WIN3.8 mg
0.4 mg
Magnesiummore is better
56 mg
—
Vitamin Cmore is better
1.8 mg
—
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.