Abalone, cooked vs Drum, cooked

Abalone, cooked3

Leader

Drum, cooked5

Drum, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Abalone, cooked: 100 g · Drum, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Drum, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Drum, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more calcium.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
189 kcal
153 kcal
Proteinmore is better
19.63 g
22.49 gWIN
Carbohydrate
11.05 g
0 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
0 g
Total sugarsless is better
—
—
Total fat
6.78 g
6.32 g
Saturated fatless is better
1.65 g
1.43 gWIN
Sodiumless is better
591 mg
96 mgWIN
Potassiummore is better
284 mg
353 mgWIN
Calciummore is better
37 mg
77 mgWIN
Ironmore is better
WIN3.8 mg
1.15 mg
Magnesiummore is better
WIN56 mg
38 mg
Vitamin Cmore is better
WIN1.8 mg
1 mg
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.