Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, cooked Leader
Abalone, cooked5
VS
Lobster, cooked
Lobster, cooked3

Abalone, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Abalone, cooked: 100 g · Lobster, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Abalone, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for more protein, more potassium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Lobster, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium and more calcium.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    189 kcal
    89 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN19.63 g
    19 g
  • Carbohydrate
    11.05 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    6.78 g
    0.86 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.65 g
    0.21 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    591 mg
    486 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN284 mg
    230 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    37 mg
    96 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN3.8 mg
    0.29 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN56 mg
    43 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN1.8 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, cooked vs Lobster, cooked · Foodatron