Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, cooked
Abalone, cooked4
VS
Mackerel, cooked
Mackerel, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Abalone, cooked: 100 g · Mackerel, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for less saturated fat, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Pick Mackerel, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    189 kcal
    262 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    19.63 g
    23.85 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    11.05 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    6.78 g
    17.81 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.65 g
    4.18 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    591 mg
    83 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    284 mg
    401 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN37 mg
    15 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN3.8 mg
    1.57 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    56 mg
    97 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN1.8 mg
    0.4 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, cooked vs Mackerel, cooked · Foodatron