Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, cooked
Abalone, cooked3
VS
Mussels, cooked Leader
Mussels, cooked5

Mussels, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Mussels, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for more potassium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Pick Mussels, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    189 kcal
    172 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    19.63 g
    23.8 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    11.05 g
    7.39 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    6.78 g
    4.48 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.65 g
    0.85 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    591 mg
    369 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN284 mg
    268 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN37 mg
    33 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    3.8 mg
    6.72 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN56 mg
    37 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    1.8 mg
    13.6 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, cooked vs Mussels, cooked · Foodatron