Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Abalone, cooked Leader
Abalone, cooked3
VS
Skinless & Boneless Mackerel Fillets In Tomato Sauce1

Abalone, cooked leads 3–1 · 4 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Abalone, cooked comes out ahead, winning 3 of 4 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat and less sodium.

Pick Skinless & Boneless Mackerel Fillets In Tomato Sauce for more fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    189 kcal
    137.6 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN19.63 g
    13.92 g
  • Carbohydrate
    11.05 g
    1.28 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    3.04 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    1.28 g
  • Total fat
    6.78 g
    10.08 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.65 g
    2.4 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN591 mg
    624 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    284 mg
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    37 mg
    —
  • Ironmore is better
    3.8 mg
    —
  • Magnesiummore is better
    56 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    1.8 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, cooked vs Skinless & Boneless Mackerel Fillets In Tomato Sauce · Foodatron