Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Abalone, cooked
Abalone, cooked2
VS
Skinless And Boneless Mackerel Fillets In A Tomato Sauce2

Dead heat · 4 categories decided

Abalone, cooked: 100 g · Skinless And Boneless Mackerel Fillets In A Tomato Sauce: 100 g.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 2 of 4 match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for more protein and less saturated fat.

Pick Skinless And Boneless Mackerel Fillets In A Tomato Sauce for more fiber and less sodium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    189 kcal
    162 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN19.63 g
    14.1 g
  • Carbohydrate
    11.05 g
    3 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0.5 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    1.9 g
  • Total fat
    6.78 g
    10.4 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.65 g
    2.8 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    591 mg
    0.84 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    284 mg
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    37 mg
    —
  • Ironmore is better
    3.8 mg
    —
  • Magnesiummore is better
    56 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    1.8 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, cooked vs Skinless And Boneless Mackerel Fillets In A Tomato Sauce · Foodatron