Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, cooked
Abalone, cooked4
VS
Salmon, cooked
Salmon, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Abalone, cooked: 100 g · Salmon, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for less saturated fat, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Salmon, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    189 kcal
    206 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    19.63 g
    22.1 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    11.05 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    6.78 g
    12.35 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.65 g
    2.4 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    591 mg
    61 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    284 mg
    384 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN37 mg
    15 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN3.8 mg
    0.34 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN56 mg
    30 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    1.8 mg
    3.7 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, cooked vs Salmon, cooked · Foodatron