Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, cooked Leader
Abalone, cooked5
VS
Scallops, cooked
Scallops, cooked3

Abalone, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Abalone, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for less sodium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Scallops, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat and more potassium.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    189 kcal
    111 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    19.63 g
    20.54 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    11.05 g
    5.41 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    6.78 g
    0.84 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.65 g
    0.22 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN591 mg
    667 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    284 mg
    314 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN37 mg
    10 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN3.8 mg
    0.58 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN56 mg
    37 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN1.8 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, cooked vs Scallops, cooked · Foodatron