Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, cooked
Abalone, cooked3
VS
Shad, cooked Leader
Shad, cooked4

Shad, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 1 tie

Abalone, cooked: 100 g · Shad, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Shad, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Shad, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium and more calcium.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    189 kcal
    252 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    19.63 g
    21.71 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    11.05 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    6.78 g
    17.65 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.65 g
    —
  • Sodiumless is better
    591 mg
    65 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    284 mg
    492 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    37 mg
    60 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN3.8 mg
    1.24 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN56 mg
    38 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN1.8 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, cooked vs Shad, cooked · Foodatron