Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, cooked
Abalone, cooked1
VS
Shrimp, cooked Leader
Shrimp, cooked6

Shrimp, cooked leads 6–1 · 7 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Shrimp, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for more iron.

Pick Shrimp, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    10.39 g
    24.22 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    5.85 g
    0.2 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    3.59 g
    0.28 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.87 g
    0.06 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    312.7 mg
    112.12 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    150.26 mg
    261.62 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    19.58 mg
    70.71 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.01 mg
    0.52 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    29.63 mg
    39.39 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.95 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, cooked vs Shrimp, cooked · Foodatron