Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, cooked
Abalone, cooked3
VS
Skipjack tuna, cooked Leader
Skipjack tuna, cooked4

Skipjack tuna, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Skipjack tuna, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Skipjack tuna, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium and more potassium.

Evenly matched on fiber and calcium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    189 kcal
    132 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    19.63 g
    28.21 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    11.05 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    6.78 g
    1.29 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.65 g
    0.42 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    591 mg
    47 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    284 mg
    522 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    37 mg
    37 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN3.8 mg
    1.6 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN56 mg
    44 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN1.8 mg
    1 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, cooked vs Skipjack tuna, cooked · Foodatron