Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, cooked Leader
Abalone, cooked5
VS
Swordfish, cooked
Swordfish, cooked3

Abalone, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Abalone, cooked: 100 g · Swordfish, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Abalone, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for less saturated fat, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Swordfish, cooked for more protein, less sodium and more potassium.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    189 kcal
    172 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    19.63 g
    23.45 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    11.05 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    6.78 g
    7.93 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.65 g
    1.91 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    591 mg
    97 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    284 mg
    499 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN37 mg
    6 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN3.8 mg
    0.45 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN56 mg
    35 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN1.8 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, cooked vs Swordfish, cooked · Foodatron