Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Abalone, cooked Leader
Abalone, cooked3
VS
Mackerel Fillets In Tomato Sauce2

Abalone, cooked leads 3–2 · 5 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Abalone, cooked comes out ahead, winning 3 of 5 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat and more iron.

Pick Mackerel Fillets In Tomato Sauce for more fiber and less sodium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    189 kcal
    203.2 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN19.63 g
    12.4 g
  • Carbohydrate
    11.05 g
    3.36 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    1.44 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    3.36 g
  • Total fat
    6.78 g
    15.2 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.65 g
    2.96 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    591 mg
    264 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    284 mg
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    37 mg
    —
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN3.8 mg
    0 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    56 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    1.8 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, cooked vs Mackerel Fillets In Tomato Sauce · Foodatron