Whelk, cooked leads 8–0 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie
Both foods compared at 100 kcal.
The verdict
Whelk, cooked comes out ahead, winning 8 of 8 nutrient match-ups.
Pick Whelk, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.
Evenly matched on fiber.
Head-to-head
- Energy100 kcal100 kcal
- Proteinmore is better10.39 g17.34 gWIN
- Carbohydrate5.85 g5.64 g
- Fibermore is better0 g0 g
- Total sugarsless is better——
- Total fat3.59 g0.29 g
- Saturated fatless is better0.87 g0.02 gWIN
- Sodiumless is better312.7 mg149.82 mgWIN
- Potassiummore is better150.26 mg252.36 mgWIN
- Calciummore is better19.58 mg41.09 mgWIN
- Ironmore is better2.01 mg3.66 mgWIN
- Magnesiummore is better29.63 mg62.55 mgWIN
- Vitamin Cmore is better0.95 mg2.47 mgWIN
- Vitamin Dmore is better——
Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

