Abalone, cooked vs Yellowfin tuna, cooked

Abalone, cooked3

Leader

Yellowfin tuna, cooked5

Yellowfin tuna, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Yellowfin tuna, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Pick Yellowfin tuna, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
100 kcal
100 kcal
Proteinmore is better
10.39 g
22.42 gWIN
Carbohydrate
5.85 g
0 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
0 g
Total sugarsless is better
—
0 g
Total fat
3.59 g
0.45 g
Saturated fatless is better
0.87 g
0.16 gWIN
Sodiumless is better
312.7 mg
41.54 mgWIN
Potassiummore is better
150.26 mg
405.38 mgWIN
Calciummore is better
WIN19.58 mg
3.08 mg
Ironmore is better
WIN2.01 mg
0.71 mg
Magnesiummore is better
29.63 mg
32.31 mgWIN
Vitamin Cmore is better
WIN0.95 mg
0 mg
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.