Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, raw Leader
Abalone, raw5
VS
Bluefish, cooked
Bluefish, cooked3

Abalone, raw leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Abalone, raw comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, raw for less saturated fat, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for more protein, less sodium and more potassium.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    105 kcal
    159 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    17.1 g
    25.69 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    6.01 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.76 g
    5.44 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.15 g
    1.17 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    301 mg
    77 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    250 mg
    477 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN31 mg
    9 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN3.19 mg
    0.62 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN48 mg
    42 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN2 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, raw vs Bluefish, cooked · Foodatron