Abalone, raw vs Boneless Butterflied Sardine Fillets

Abalone, raw leads 4–2 · 6 categories decided · 1 tie

Abalone, raw: 100 g · Boneless Butterflied Sardine Fillets: 80 g.

The verdict

Abalone, raw comes out ahead, winning 4 of 6 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, raw for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium and more iron.

Pick Boneless Butterflied Sardine Fillets for more fiber and more calcium.

Evenly matched on sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
105 kcal
133.33 kcal
Proteinmore is better
WIN17.1 g
16 g
Carbohydrate
6.01 g
1 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
1 gWIN
Total sugarsless is better
0 g
0 g
Total fat
0.76 g
7 g
Saturated fatless is better
WIN0.15 g
1 g
Sodiumless is better
WIN301 mg
330 mg
Potassiummore is better
250 mg
—
Calciummore is better
31 mg
100 mgWIN
Ironmore is better
WIN3.19 mg
1.9 mg
Magnesiummore is better
48 mg
—
Vitamin Cmore is better
2 mg
—
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.