Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, raw
Abalone, raw4
VS
Burbot, cooked
Burbot, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Abalone, raw for less saturated fat, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Burbot, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium and more calcium.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    16.29 g
    21.53 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    5.72 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.72 g
    0.9 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.14 g
    0.18 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    286.67 mg
    107.83 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    238.1 mg
    450.43 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    29.52 mg
    55.65 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN3.04 mg
    1 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN45.71 mg
    35.65 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN1.9 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, raw vs Burbot, cooked · Foodatron