Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, raw Leader
Abalone, raw7
VS
Canned tuna in oil
Canned tuna in oil1

Abalone, raw leads 7–1 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Abalone, raw: 100 g · Canned tuna in oil: 100 g.

The verdict

Abalone, raw comes out ahead, winning 7 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, raw for less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Canned tuna in oil for more protein.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    105 kcal
    198 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    17.1 g
    29.13 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    6.01 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    0.76 g
    8.21 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.15 g
    1.53 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN301 mg
    416 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN250 mg
    207 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN31 mg
    13 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN3.19 mg
    1.39 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN48 mg
    31 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN2 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, raw vs Canned tuna in oil · Foodatron