Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, raw
Abalone, raw4
VS
Clams, cooked
Clams, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Abalone, raw: 100 g · Clams, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Abalone, raw for less saturated fat, less sodium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Clams, cooked for more protein, more potassium, more calcium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    105 kcal
    148 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    17.1 g
    25.55 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    6.01 g
    5.13 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.76 g
    1.95 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.15 g
    0.19 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN301 mg
    1202 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    250 mg
    628 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    31 mg
    92 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN3.19 mg
    2.81 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN48 mg
    18 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    2 mg
    22.1 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, raw vs Clams, cooked · Foodatron